Scamming The Good Samaritans

Lately I had been receiving several calls from people who claimed that they were from the not for profit organisations that I had donated to in the past. The intention of the calls were quite clear: they thanked me for my past donations and wondered if I would like to donate more. One thing that I found odd was the smell of desperation that I sensed by just chatting with them. Here is a grossly summarised conversation between me and a particular caller claiming to be from UNICEF:

Caller: Hi this is XXXXX from UNICEF, may I speak with Irwan?
Me: This is Irwan, how are you?
...
...
Caller: We would like to thank you for your very generous past contribution (as far as I recalled, I only ever donated $50 to UNICEF) ...
...
...
Caller: Do you know that XXXXX country is having XXXXX issue at the moment and require urgent supports, would you be able to do once off donation of $100 ?
Me: Sorry I would like to donate but I am not in the position to commit at the moment
...
...
Caller: How about $30, is that something you could do?
Me: I need to get back to you on that, can you send me email so I can donate through online?
Caller: We are sorry, as part of our effort to reduce costs, we are not sending emails or accepting online donations (how is hiring a horde of telemarketers and not having an online donation webpage a reduction in cost?)
...
...
Me: Sorry, my lunch break is over, I gotta go, maybe give me a call again tomorrow?
Caller: OK sure we'll definitely give you a call again (FYI, I never get called back)
Me: Thanks, cya.

---------

This might be a gross simplified conversation that I had, and might be kind of subjective to me too, but there are two main oddity that gave it away to me as a scam:

Bargaining for a lesser donation.

From my past experience, a real not for profit organisation representative would never bargain for a lesser donation or try to push the potential donor to donate on the spot.

Claiming they do not have online donation.

This is probably the most give away clue, most of the well known not for profit organisations have an online donation page in their official websites. It is very clear that the caller try to avoid the potential donor to donate directly through the official sites since they will not be able to gain any card information or the money.


Here are some of the well known not for profit organisations and their online donation pages:







As you can see, it is perfectly possible to donate online, which bring me to a conclusion that, although not widely as popular as the IRS scam, the donation scam does indeed exists albeit less lucrative.

However, such scam can easily be avoided by telling the caller that you will donate through the official website's online donation page or just say you do not wish to donate at all at the moment.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Implementing gRPC Using Spring Boot and Gradle Background GRPC (gRPC) is a RPC framework pioneered by google later on made public and open source. GRPC has not been officially supported by Spring Framework, so far there are few community libraries that can work seamlessly with Spring Boot. In this article, I will use the lognet's grpc-spring-boot-starter. Project Structure Ideally, the proto files for gRPC is located in another directory, which will then be accessed by the gradle plugin to auto generate the required files.   Gradle Script The heart of gRPC enablement lies on the grpc boot starter, which includes few other tasks outlined as below. https://github.com/overtakerx/grpcbootdemo/blob/main/build.gradle Few important note: first you have to run gradlew compileJava for the auto generation to generate the files from the proto file, then you will need to rebuild the project for Intellij to recognise the auto-generated files. Full demo: https://github.com/overtakerx/grpcbootdem
Read more

Spring Boot 2: Parallelism with Spring WebFlux

Image
Spring Boot 2: Parallelism with Spring WebFlux Parallelism is rather unusual in Spring application, however when we encounter the need of HITLOL (HIgh Throughput LOw Latency), we need ways to make async calls. With Spring Boot 1, in high level definition, we can declare async on all the functions that are meant to be parallel and return Futures from there. Here is more detailed info:  https://medium.com/sipios/how-to-make-parallel-calls-in-java-springboot-application-and-how-to-test-them-dcc27318a0cf For Spring Boot 2, we shall employ Spring WebFlux libraries to accomplish parallelism. Mainly focused on functions: Mono.zipDelayError(), Mono.subscribeOn() and Mono.onErrorResume() The main function that drives the parallelism is zipDelayError(), the purpose of zipDelayError() as supposed to using zip() is to enable the other Monos to run to completion even if one Mono failed. AllDtos allDtos = Mono. zipDelayError (Arrays. asList (firstDto , secondDto , (Mono&l
Read more

Spring Boot Reactive API Part 2

Image
 Spring Boot Reactive: Improving CPU bound performance using Scheduler In part 1 , we have seen that Spring Boot Reactive doesn't really improve performance if the WAITING time is CPU bound / CPU intensive tasks. This article show a quick way on how we can improve the speed through specific configuration Setup Spring Boot's embedded Tomcat is reconfigured to only use 10 worker threads, this way we can clearly see the performance limitation and tweaks. Gatling is configured to simulate 30 concurrent requests with 30000 milliseconds request timeout. APIs internal process is calling java native code that calculate the value of PI over 1 million iterations Default / No scheduler The main reason why CPU bound tasks do not improve (or even degrade) with high parallelism is because of the costly overhead for context switching in the low level. In the scenario below, 10 main threads are all being used to calculate PI values and because there are less CPU than threads, a lot of context
Read more